Furthermore, this model also packs anintegrated audio interface expansion port, which makes a recording with it allthe easier. This being sai it’s quite obvious thatthe X‘compact’ mixing console actually packs a vast array of settings, andpeople don’t love it so much for its portability alone.
See full list on arxmusica. The features of the Xproducer consoleare somewhat similar to those the XCompact comes supplied with. It also packs forty input channels, sixteenMidas designed mic preamps, a dedicated channel-strip section, ULTRANETconnectivity, eight XLR outputs and six additional line-in outputs, and such. However, there are plenty of differences between these two consoles where the‘Producer’ has the upper hand.
It also packs a bigger 7-inch TFT, whereas theCompact features a 5-inch TFT, Ethernet connectivity, rack-mount brackets, anda substantially bigger display. However, since the difference between these two is a mere $1(street price, not officially), it wouldn’t be fair to say that one is ‘cheaper’ than the other substantially. However, the boardis a bit smaller, so all of the functions, sliders, buttons, and knobs arebasically cramped onto a slightly smaller platform.
The XCompact’s dimensions are 24. DJ booth, as well as in your van or tour bus. It also weighsonly pounds, which isn’t lightweight per se, but it’s certainly much lighterthan the vast majority of mixing consoles.
This means that this model is perfectlysuited for traveling musicians and gigging DJs, sound engineers, and soundtechnicians. By being able to transport it more easily while economizing yourworkspace, this console provides the much-needed benefits for any live acts. While the XCompact is best used by soundengineers, sound technicians, and DJs who often need to bring their ownequipment to their gigs, the Xproducer is better for ‘stationary’ work.
Simply due to the fact that the X32producer has a bigger boar the sliders, buttons, and knobs are more efficientlyplace which leads us to the conclusion that the sound techs and engineerswill have a better overview. All of the Xversions have channels,but the Compact and Producer versions have a substantially lower number of micinputs, main outputs, and faders in comparison to the original one.
![Behringer x32 compact vs producer Behringer x32 compact vs producer](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yR8FMzaeKN0/maxresdefault.jpg)
The original Xhas mic inputs, mainoutputs, and faders, whereas these two have only mic inputs, mainoutputs, and faders. Of course, the ‘original’ Xalso costs roughly twiceas much as the Producer or the Compact. People often opt for the original Xfor heavier recording chores, especially if they’re recording and mixing tracks with numerous instrument layers, such as orchestras for example. From an objective standpoint, they’re equally valuable.
![Behringer x32 compact vs producer Behringer x32 compact vs producer](https://soundman.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/behringer_behringer-x32-compact-536292_02.jpg)
The physical bus send encoders have been removed from the channel strip. XCompact has basically a smaller desktop console similar to the full Xlayout.
Smaller assign section – buttons, no assign encoders, one layer. I own both a Compact and a full size X32. The Compact has two, key things over the Producer: scribble strips and mute group buttons.
If you need to run things on multiple layers, scribble strips are nearly essential. As the name suggests, the XCompact is the same product as the Xin terms of software, connectivity, and usability.
XProducer is more compact, and therefore is rack-mountable. The differences lie in the number of channels, mic inputs, main outputs, and faders. Same firmware, same functionality, just the producer is smaller and missing a few bits like mute groups (though still assignable), scribble strips and individual input LED meters. Scribble strips are lost on me (some what) I find them irritating sometimes on the Xas its so long winded to change IMO them without the app sitting next to you.
Stellt sich nun eigentlich bloß noch die Frage: Compact oder Producer. So richtig kann ich keinen großen Unterschied erkennen. Jedenfalls keinen, der für mich 3Euro Mehrpreis rechtfertigt. Für so einen Verein die "Entscheidungsschranke".
![Behringer x32 compact vs producer Behringer x32 compact vs producer](https://dt7v1i9vyp3mf.cloudfront.net/styles/news_large/s3/imagelibrary/B/Behringer-X32-Compact_01-RbXvSagnvSKLfRvg29Atm13d1fzWr7zJ.jpg)
AV, Sound and Lighting and Laser Hire. The Midas Mand M32R are also possibilities. The scribble strips are the little LED windows above the faders which help label the faders you are touching!
XLR inputs and XLR outputs on this just like the XCompact. ELAN2e Retrouvez le.
To get output from AUX OUT 1- OUT 1-( X) or OUT 1-( Compact, Producer, and Rack), you must assign the input or mix bus which will go to each XLR or TRS output. Press the ROUTING button and use the PAGE select buttons to view the out 1-menu.
Bei den kleineren Versionen der Pulte (Rack und Compact ) kommt sogar noch etwas hinzu, die Displays sind unterschiedlich groß. Eigentlich ist das Midas MRack ein Behringer Producer.
Aber auch bei den großen Versionen der Pulte, im LIVE-Betrieb bedient man das Behringer Xschneller! Although I find the Behringer Xquite usable and sounding quite goo I hate the interface. XTips for Creating Library Templates.
An incredibly beneficial aspect of your Behringer Xis utilizing its ability to remember. Not only will we cover scene management, but introduce you to 3rd party utilities which make saving and retrieving files to and from your computer much easier than the X’s native ability.